The Quality of the System and the Behavior of Muzaki in Non-Cash Zakat Payments: The Case of Baznas Pekanbaru, Indonesia

Lelik  Suprapto; Muhammad Lisman; Rika Septianingsih

doi:10.63919/surau.v1i1.7

Penulis

Lelik Suprapto Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9694-1283
Muhammad Lisman Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9618-4427
Rika Septianingsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5335-0484

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63919/surau.v1i1.7

Kata Kunci:

System Quality, Muzaki Behavior, Non-Cash Zakat, Baznas Pekanbaru, Digital Payments, System Influence

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the impact of the quality of non-cash zakat payment systems on the behavior of muzaki in fulfilling their zakat obligations through digital platforms at Baznas Pekanbaru. Non-cash zakat payments have become a more practical alternative, but muzaki participation in Pekanbaru is still relatively low. This research uses a quantitative approach, collecting data through questionnaires distributed to 40 muzaki who use the non-cash zakat payment system. Validity and reliability tests were conducted to ensure the quality of the data, while linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between system quality (ease of use, security, and service quality) and muzaki behavior. The results indicate that system quality has a significant and positive impact on muzaki behavior. The regression coefficient of 0.640 suggests that each 1% improvement in system quality can increase muzaki behavior by 64%. The T-test shows a significance value of 0.000, indicating that system quality significantly influences the decision of muzaki to use digital platforms for zakat payments. Therefore, this study recommends that Baznas Pekanbaru continue to improve the quality of the non-cash zakat payment system and carry out socialization and education for the public to increase muzaki participation. This study also suggests that future research should consider a larger sample size and varying methods to obtain more comprehensive results.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Afandi, M. Y. (2023). Analyzing the Impact of Digital Transformation in Islamic Philanthropy using UTAUT Model. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 19(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v19i2.16086

Ahmad, Z. A., & Rusdianto, R. (2018). The Analysis of Amil Zakat Institution/Lembaga Amil Zakat (LAZ) Accountability toward Public Satisfaction and Trust. Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 9(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.18326/muqtasid.v9i2.109-119

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Alam, N. (2010). Islamic Venture Philanthropy: A Tool for Sustainable Community Development. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1565859

Almog-Bar, M., & Zychlinski, E. (2014). Collaboration between philanthropic foundations and government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2013-0036

Bahri, E. S., Salamun, A., & Arif, Z. (2022). Measuring the Effectiveness of Zakat Disbursement at Amil Zakat Institution Dewan Da’wah Utilizing Zakat Core Principle Approach. Al Maal: Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking, 4(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.31000/almaal.v4i1.5937

Chotib, M., Muhammad Fauzinudin Faiz, & Ikhsan Abdullah. (2023). Establishing a Zakat Culture based on Good Zakat Governance and Good Zakat Empowerment in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Perspectives, 5(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.35719/jiep.v5i2.121

Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

Durohman, H., Fajar Adrian Sutisna, & Muhammad Yuka Anugrah. (2023). Socio-Economic Determinants of Individual Muslim Zakat Payment Behavior in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 4(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v4i2.6715

Hamidi, I., Liliana, L., Gustriani, G., Atiyatna, D. P., & Sari, D. D. P. (2022). Zakat Empowerment in Mustahiq Economic Recovery During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Sriwijaya International Journal Of Dynamic Economics And Business, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v6i2.185-196

Hasibuan, R., Pimada, L. M., Rabbani, A. M., & Malik, S. (2022). The Role of the Indonesian National Amil Zakat Agency in Social Finance Management As an Effort to Alleviate Poverty. Maliki Islamic Economics Journal, 2(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.18860/miec.v2i1.16465

Hidayati, T. W. (2022). The Implication of Good Governance in Elevating Muzaki’s Loyalty to the Islamic Philanthropy Organizations in Salatiga City and Semarang Regency, Indonesia. INFERENSI: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 16(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v16i1.63-90

Hudaefi, F. A., Caraka, R. E., & Wahid, H. (2022). Zakat administration in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A knowledge discovery via text mining. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2020-0250

Kholis, N. & Mugiyati. (2021). Distribution of Productive Zakat for Reducing Urban Poverty in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53333/IJICC2013/15303

Luqmanul Hakim, M., Utami, A. N., & Fissalma, H. (2023). Digital Transformation Strategy For Non-Government Organization (Case Study: Inisiatif Zakat Indonesia). Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 4(12), 2269–2287. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v4i12.825

Mawardi, I., Widiastuti, T., Al Mustofa, M. U., & Hakimi, F. (2023). Analyzing the impact of productive zakat on the welfare of zakat recipients. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2021-0145

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., ... & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907.